Terrorism in Pakistan Essay
Terrorism in Pakistan
No one can forget the disaster happened last September 11 of 2001. The city was terrorized by the people who are not afraid in their suicidal actions and their pleasure to kill. And what purpose? – Maybe someone answered this tricky question, but in a place where the democracy and equality prevails, the idea of terrorism and their ideologies are not welcome.
Many actions against the terrorism is already place in priority and shorthand phrase “war on terrorism” is the word that can describe the United States’ response to the terrorist attacks. The war they proposed is just like the previous wars can be won by simply killing all their enemies and probably the potential enemies. But still, this war is a different kind of war; the enemies are immeasurable, meaning nobody knows the real enemy in the line of the suspects. And there are chances that the military force is outnumbered. Therefore, the word strategic approach is the main requirement to manage the catastrophe (2004).
There are many reports about the alliances and partnerships of the Al Qaeda with the indigenous Pakistani terrorist groups that implicated both attacks on the West and somewhere in India. Still, many advocates and concern groups against the terrorism have grown hopes saying that the success in the struggle against the global terrorism will likely be decided.
On the other hand, the Pakistan government is part of setting an end on the terrorism and like what is expected, many raised their questions about the government’s determination, sincerity and effectiveness of their efforts. As widely known, Pakistan became the center of terrorism issues and doubts are hauled by the Western experts. Those doubts are mixed with concerns about the implications of maintaining the present policies implemented by the U.S. and the efficacy of their latest strategy.
The implemented latest strategy came from Islamabad which appears to seek reconciliation with the pro-Taliban militants. If the people really want to end the war then, there should be no doubts in the anti-terrorism policies and the so-called “war on terrorism” should be emphasized through uplifting the socioeconomic and resolution of outstanding disputes in Muslim world (2007). Even the election process on the Pakistan is under the crisis in which relatively caused by the terrorism attacks. The issues about the self-interest of the politicians are considered as another symptom of the birth of the terrorism ( 2003; 2006).
The Consequences of the Action
There are measured consequences in the campaign of against the war. First, usually the captured terrorists or terrorist suspects are not all member of Al Qaeda in which there is no hard evidence if they are related to the group in some ways. In this situation, the people will transfer in the United States. Second, it will force the senior Al Qaeda operatives to leave simply by no means. The less ideologically congenial surroundings and the need of the terrorists to the communication increase the chances of susceptibility to detection and arrest. And thirdly, the dramatic irruption of the Pakistani estate and their connection to the Al Qaeda emphasizes the issue of doubt on their sincerity. Other that that, the population is violently pro-Taliban, and the presence of the Pakistan Army is thin, has inadvertently made the task be more difficult (2007; 2008). A strategy for the war on terrorism must consist of three elements: homeland security, dismantling Al Qaeda forces, and a foreign policy that does not needlessly create new terrorists (2004).
Is There a Failure?
Is there a present failure on the ways of the Pakistan in battle against the terrorism? There are many requirements that the Pakistan government should consider before bringing the democracy in their nation. For the other countries, sovereignty can help them achieve the stability, strength and power not because of the contributions of few individuals but because of the strong institution, stable systems, and well-rooted traditions – all are part of the evolution. It may be part of the political process and democracy in Pakistan had failed and will fail again if they did not bring the stability to the country. However, the answer is not in giving up on the democracy or democratic process but to adhere it seriously and closely (2006).
There is still hope for Pakistan. There are still other strategies and approaches available for the country to be introduced as a country that breathes peace. The terrorism of their past will hunt them down if they continued their practice. The efforts to set the war on the terrorism should be entitled with full focus and sincerity, if the rulers really want to promote the “terrorism-free land”.